I'm beginning to feel a bit more rested, and a bit more willing to face the world. Though, I still sit in silence with my thoughts at home...only venturing out if I absolutely must. (And since I promised Chara Grace that I would come play today, it appears that I must.)
I've been enjoying the time with a bit of study. Trying to define for myself what the Scriptures, and not cultural institutions and presuppositions around me, say about being a woman. There's an incredible amount of crap out there under the heading "biblical manhood and womanhood" and "Christian wifrey," and frankly I don't want to have anything to do with it, which makes it all the more necessary to consult Scripture. I've been reading for the first time Matthew Henry's commentary. He's right up my alley, too, being a 17th c fella. So lucid and profound in a short amount of space. I like that. I don't have patience to read reams to get to the point.
I thought my little study would take me the morning, but I quickly see that it will take me a lifetime. Silly me. It's mid-afternoon and I haven't gotten past the first few chapters of Genesis! What is interesting is the use of the word "man." It means male and female. We all know that, right? But the implications for that, and in light of this our responsibility to creation, perhaps we haven't quite thought through as extensively. "Man," as male and female, is made in the image of God. There are three aspects, according to Henry, of being made in the image of God: 1. It is our soul in its understanding, will, and active power that bear God's image. (God does not have a body, so our bodies do not bear His image.), 2. We bear power and authority...in governing the creatures and in self-governance, and 3. Consisting in knowledge, righteousness, and holiness, which we are able to have anew in Christ, after the loss of purity in the fall. And the creation of "man," as male and female, has come with the blessings of fruitfulness and increase.
So what's my point? I don't know. I think sometimes we subconsciously associate "dominion" with men, and "fruitfulness" with women. But there's nothing here that makes that distinction. It is as if one person ("man") is doing all these things. We may know this mentally already, but it doesn't look like that when I see the tasks, enterprises, and mindsets that women and men set forth on and function in.
Recent comments
21 hours 36 min ago
5 days 5 hours ago
6 days 3 hours ago
1 week 5 days ago
1 week 6 days ago
2 weeks 2 days ago
2 weeks 2 days ago
4 weeks 3 days ago
4 weeks 4 days ago
4 weeks 5 days ago