I received this email from the Alumni Office at Covenant:
You are cordially invited to attend the dedication of Covenant's College's new flag station and the raising of the flag of the United States of America on Veterans' Day, Tuesday, November 11, 2003, at 11:30am in the Carter Hall front circle (in case of rain, in the Chapel).
All alumni who are veterans or who are currently serving in one of the four branches of the military are invited to come in dress uniform, if appropriate, and to have lunch with current students serving inactive and active in the military following the ceremony. Alumnus 2nd Lieutenant Stephen Gienapp ('94) and Alumnus Corporal Kal Dawson ('94), USMC retired, will be participating in the ceremony and current students in the military will be presenting colors.
This event will provide a wonderful opportunity for our military alumni to meet current students who are serving and to share thoughts on being called to a life of service in the armed forces with students and alumni alike.
If I remember correctly, when my class was deciding what we should give the college for our senior gift, the idea of a flag pole and American flag was raised. We decided against in favor of benches at the Overlook, wh. is what Dottie Brock wanted anyway. Some of the objections I raised to having a flag on campus are as follows: what kind of institution is Covenant? private. With a student body that is predominantly American, though, there are a few international students and several students who grew up overseas. One of Covenant's themes is to emphasis a broad-minded view of cultures in our country and around the world. Another theme is to stress the lack of cultural and geographical boundaries of The Church. I'm hesitant about endorsing the waving of an American flag on the campus of Covenant. To me it symbolizes a tangible connectedness to a civic loyalty that too often gets conflated with religious duty. Covenant's identity is closely related with religious institutions. To wave a flag adds a shade of politics that should not be associated with the religious institutions. It states that the particular institution is giving homage to a particular country rather than the city of God.
But saying all this puts me in awkward situation. Because waving the flag is billed as "supporting the troops." So when I am hesitant about waving a flag because of ideological grounds, I'm automatically not supporting the troops according to the way waving the flag is stated. The email from Covenant inextricably combines the two. I'm all for supporting the troops. My brother is in the Air Force, for crying out loud! And many of them are performing an onerous task in the Middle East (something I also have words about but won't say here and now). It is wretchedly manipulative of the school to combine flying the flag with supporting the troops.
The Bush administration and the response of the Christian community has caused me to become very on edge. Whatever happened to the separation of church and state? Whatever happened to the Reformed, historically-informed response of The Search for Christian American? Whatever happened to "I believe in one holy catholic and apostolic church"? Because if we keep going like this the Church will be distant memory.
Recent comments
1 day 18 min ago
5 days 8 hours ago
6 days 6 hours ago
1 week 5 days ago
1 week 6 days ago
2 weeks 2 days ago
2 weeks 2 days ago
4 weeks 3 days ago
4 weeks 4 days ago
4 weeks 5 days ago